Survey says…
In the 1990s, artists Vitaly Komar and Alexander Melamid created People’s Choice, a series of paintings based on surveys about what people like and do not like in art. The polls were conducted in China, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Holland, Iceland, Italy, Kenya, Portugal, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine, and the United States, and they asked questions like:
What’s your favorite color? Do you prefer modern or traditional styles? A natural setting or a portrait? An outdoor or an indoor scene? What season? Do you like paintings related to religion? Should paintings teach a lesson? Should they be realistic or different-looking? Should they have a bold and stark or a playful and whimsical design? Sharp angles or soft curves? Brushstrokes visible or smooth-looking? Colors blended or separate? Should paintings be serious or festive? Busy or simple? Large or small?
The polls also asked participants to agree or disagree with the following statement: “I only like art that makes me happy.” Nearly two-thirds of the world population surveyed agreed, a quarter disagreed, and the remainder were “not sure.”
The paintings of the People’s Choice series bear a striking resemblence to one another across cultural boundaries (with the notable exceptions of Holland, Germany, and Italy).
Komar and Melamid’s France’s Most Unwanted 1995
oil on canvas, 82.5 x 200 inches (wall size)
For the most part, people worldwide dislike abstract art with very textured paint…
Komar and Melamid’s France’s Most Wanted 1995
oil on canvas, 16 x 22 inches (television size)
...and they prefer landscapes and the color blue.
Komar and Melamid’s China’s Most Unwanted 1996
mixed media on wood, 5.5 x 8.5 inches (paperback size)
The series of paintings revealed how useless the mass’ averaged opinion is when applied to individual cases. Though the works followed everyone’s taste scrupulously, they inspire few people individually.
The paintings that Komar and Melamid made were more than simply images based on crowd-sourced directives. They were a bland and flat version of the poll results, lacking the least bit of artistic spark. It seems to me that Komar and Melamid drained the paintings of any spirit in order to more fully make their point: the People’s Choice series is a critique of democracy and specifically of the politicians who allow themselves to be controlled by surveys. Like Komar and Melamid’s paintings, those politicians lose what’s most likeable and worthwhile about them when they try to appeal to everyone equally.
Komar and Melamid’s China’s Most Wanted 1996
oil on canvas, 90.5 x 150 inches (wall size)
But the paintings themselves weren’t the real product of the series, not at least as far as I can tell. Long before the images were created, People’s Choice made a space for its particpants to talk and think about art in a way that most people do not usually have the occasion to do. It allowed people to define themselves against the opinions of others during the town hall forums and focus groups organized by Komar and Melamid. It created a conversation about art that wasn’t limited by any particular work but only by what the participants could imagine.
Komar and Melamid’s America’s Most Unwanted 1994
tempera and oil on canvas, 5.5 x 8.5 inches (paperback size)
During one such conversation, Melamid said: “I feel like a sultan in a harem; I am sure that there will be people who will not be satisfied fully.”* Indeed, the genius of People’s Choice is in how it reveals the aspects of the maker’s relationship with the audience that many modern and contemporary artists are not willing to acknowledge.
Melamid again, during an interview: “We’ll always serve some people, or someone, maybe unconsciously. So let’s do it consciously. Let’s serve the people. Stop playing the game that we’re freewheeling artists. We’re not! We’re slaves of the society. We have to…choose the masters. Unlike in Russia, we have this choice. Because Russian serfs didn’t have any choice; the masters were given to them. But here we live in a free society; we can choose our masters. Maybe that’s what freedom is—this is a new definition of freedom.”*
Komar and Melamid’s America’s Most Wanted 1994
oil and acrylic on canvas, 24 x 32 inches (dishwasher size)
Art has always been in the service of someone, whether that was a private patron or a government bent on using it as propaganda. After all, even the Abstract Expressionists, who were by definition disengaged from current events, were co-opted by the US government. While the Soviets were busy churning out endless examples of social realism, the American government was condemning artists whose work contained an activist element and parading Jackson Pollock and company around the world as shiny models of individual thought and creativity.
It’s no coincidence that Pollock, the most famous of the Abstract Expressionists, was not an immigrant but an American of many generations and originally from the heartland to boot. Nor is it a happy accident that Abstract Expressionism became the defining moment of New York and the United States taking over as the center of art. Our national political machine actively promoted the movement.
Komar and Melamid’s Holland’s Most Unwanted 1997
acrylic on canvas, 81 x 130 inches (wall size)
It’s silly that any artists believe that they can be completely free of society—no person can ever be. We’re always engaged with our fellow humans, either in harmony or in rebellion. There’s always a back and forth. Besides, if artists were severed from the rest of society, what value could their work possibly have? Art is about communication and artists can’t very well communicate in or with a vacuum.
Komar and Melamid’s Holland’s Most Wanted 1997
mixed media on canvas, 10.5 x 13.5 inches (magazine size)
I suppose the reason why I find Komar and Melamid’s project so fascinating is that it’s precisely the opposite of what I do in my commission work. Instead of millions, I ask just one person what they want in a portrait. And I take the subject’s preferences into careful consideration but, in the end, the work is mine. I don’t subsume my creativity to the client’s directives as Komar and Melamid did by removing the individual spark from their paintings. I make a work that’s my own but that includes what the client wants.
Commission work is a collaboration that feeds both participants and that keeps an artist in her-his proper place: in a relationship with the audience.
______________________________________________________________________________________
*From Painting By Numbers: Komar And Melamid’s Scientific Guide To Art, edited by JoAnn Wypijewski.
______________________________________________________________________________________
RELATED ARTICLES:
- “Welcome to my hanging.”
- The separation of subject and portrait
- What’s wrong with this picture?
CATEGORIES: - Philosophy - Featuring artists - Reviews -
(2) Comments / Commentaires: Survey says…
A fascinating project—but I wonder if/whether they wanted to prove or disprove the adage “you can’t please everyone”,...
una...
That’s super interesting! “Most unwanted” is a brilliant idea too!
--- -- - --- - ---- - - --- ----- -- -